The  Jarrells  of Floyd County, Kentucky

Was Susannah Parks a Cherokee?

Political correctness note: there's a lot of variation in the preferred terminology for the indigenous cultures of the Americas. Some prefer Native American, some prefer Indigenous, and some prefer Indian. It appears that the Cherokee prefer to call themselves Cherokee, but both Native American and American Indian are acceptable to them (Cherokee Phoenix, Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian).

There are internet claims that Susannah Parks (1751-1825) (wife of William Jarrell) was a full-blooded Cherokee. Is it true?

Probably not. The available records suggest that before her birth, the Parks family was never in the right place at the right time to even know any Cherokee. In addition, English-style marriages between Indians and settlers were very rare due to the social conditions of the time, and both communities frowned on the practice. At least in the beginning, this opposition to intermarriage seems to have been primarily a religious/cultural issue, not a question of skin color.  The settlers in general thought it was deeply sinful to marry a non-Christian or to live like a "savage". The indigenous population thought the European religion and lifestyle was unappealing, and they could see for themselves that the Englishmen (at least in early Virginia) were so ignorant of hunting, fishing and farming that they couldn't even feed themselves, which meant they were undesirable marriage partners. There were certainly some casual hookups (the Native culture had a more relaxed attitude toward sex than English culture did), and the frequent violent clashes between the groups provided the opportunity to mix genes through rape. But marriage was a different matter. Settlers who deserted their own culture to live with the Indians were severely punished if caught, at least in the early days of settlement, so there was little assimilation of the English into the Native culture.

My Pocahontas article details the attitude toward intermarriage in Virginia. To Make Them Like Us describes the attitudes in Virginia and New England, and reports that even in New France (where missionaries encouraged intermarriage) there were few cases where a settler married a Native and the couple remained in the European community. I couldn't find any specific information about North Carolina and other locations in or near Cherokee territory; but I'd expect the attitude to be similar. The official Cherokee Nation website says that the first known missionary to the Cherokee was a Jesuit who arrived in 1736, and the first known Cherokee conversion to Christianity was in 1773. It looks like Christianity didn't really take off among the Cherokee until the 19th century. This lack of Christianity was a major impediment to marriage and assimilation into the white community. 

The original Cherokee lands and the locations of the Parks and Jarrell families
   
The relationship between the settlers and the Cherokee also deteriorated over time, making it increasingly difficult for romance to bloom. In the beginning, relations were sometimes friendly and sometimes not; but the situation took a distinctly unfriendly turn in the Anglo-Cherokee War of 1759-61. By the 1770s, the Cherokee were under pressure to cede more and more land to the settlers, and the Cherokee sided with the British during the Revolution (Wikipedia Cherokee Military History).  The Cherokee History Timeline has brief descriptions of the deteriorating state of affairs, including the land cessions. The Library of Congress has a more detailed map showing the ceded parcels, with a key in the top right corner identifying the treaties. I used this LOC map in creating my own map showing the location of the Parks/Jarrell families in relation to Cherokee lands. By the late 1830s, the situation was so bad that the US government forcibly removed most of the Cherokee from their ancestral lands and sent them to Oklahoma.

What opportunities did the Parks family have to marry into the Indigenous community, Cherokee or otherwise? The Parks family has better documentation than many colonial families, largely thanks to E.M. Parks who recorded genealogical information in his diary in 1848. The Thomas Parks website has copies of the diary (scans of the original and a typed transcript), as well as legal documents relating to the family. The links on that site don't always work for everyone, but there is an alternate transcript at USGWarchives that is less complete and accurate than the first one. There is a well-researched, 760-page article called The Parks and Related Families that is only available on Archive.org; from now on I will call it The Parks for simplicity (note: the article has little information on William and Susannah, and seems unaware that they eventually moved to Kentucky). 

The Parks doesn't entertain the slightest suspicion that the family might have Native ancestry. Page 9 has a list of about 60 people named Park or Parks who immigrated to Virginia before 1732; there is no shortage of English people who might be the founder of the colonial Parks line. The first person who can definitely be documented as an ancestor of Susannah Parks is her grandfather Thomas Parks, and the chapter on him begins on Page 14 of The Parks. Page 15 promotes the idea that he may have immigrated into Orange County VA in 1741, but there are other possibilities. He may have been born in Virginia, and might be the same Thomas Parks who was recorded as a schoolmaster in Essex County in 1693, and/or the same Thomas Parks who received a land lease in Spotsylvania County in 1728.  He is definitely the same Thomas Parks whose will was presented to the Court of Albemarle County VA in 1761. The 1752 will makes the standard references to God that were customary at the time. The will doesn't prove his ethnicity, but it does prove that he was a member of the English community and not living a tribal lifestyle, and that he was a Christian 20 years before the first known Cherokee conversion.

I'm inclined to think that Thomas Parks was born in Virginia.  If he was an immigrant who arrived in 1741, then all his children (estimated birthdates 1706-1725) must have been immigrants too, and maybe some of the grandchildren as well.  The children could have arrived in Virginia years before their father did; but they must have been conceived and born in the old country. Thomas' birthdate is usually estimated around 1670, so if he immigrated in 1741 he would have been about 70 years old at the time; a very advanced age for a difficult sea crossing. Based on the birthdates of his children, he probably wasn't born any later than 1685. The diary of E.M. Parks makes no mention of birthplaces, except to say that all the children of Thomas' son John Parks were born in Virginia in 1733-1759.  If the older generations were foreign born, it seems like that would have been worth mentioning. If Thomas Parks' children were American-born, then Thomas must have been here before the birth of his son John on 5/18/1706. The Parks page 9 doesn't show anyone named Thomas Parks arriving in Virginia between 1691 (the approximate date that Thomas turned 21) and 1706. These records could be incomplete of course, and our estimate of Thomas Parks' birthdate could be off.  But it's documented that he died in 1761, so he couldn't have been born too much earlier than 1670.

Virginia original native lands and the location of counties that may be associated with the Thomas Parks line..
   
Thomas Parks is Susannah Parks' grandfather, so we have proof that at least three generations of this family lived in the English community in Virginia before moving to North Carolina.  What does this say about their potential for Native ancestry?  Well first of all, the pre-colonial tribal maps at Virginia Places make it clear that Thomas Parks and his son John didn't live anywhere near Cherokee territory. We know that Susannah Parks was the granddaughter of a Christian, and she married William Jarrell under English (Christian) law three years before the first known conversion of a Cherokee to Christianity. It's not plausible that a Cherokee family could assimilate with the English population far away from Cherokee territory for three generations, and still maintain their ethnic status as full-blooded Cherokee. 

The counties that have been associated with the Parks family were in Powhatan or Monacan territory. So if we want to ascribe any Native ancestry to this family, we shouldn't be looking at the Cherokee. But there were impediments to marriage with other tribes too. My Pocahontas article describes the apartheid policies that the English put in place in 1632 and updated in 1646, essentially banning the Powhatan tribes and all other Indians from English territory; and the Powhatan tribes were nearly extinct by 1722. There were only three known English-Native marriages in the 1600s, and none of them involved the Parks family (Pocahontas article). Virginia passed a law in 1691 banning marriage between whites and a "negroe, mulatto, or Indian" (Encyclopedia Virginia). Interracial marriage remained illegal in Virginia until 1967, when it was overturned by the Supreme Court (NYPL).  The estimated birthdate of Thomas Parks (Susannah's grandfather) is 1670, so he would have turned 21 around 1691. If he was already living in Virginia, he didn't have much time to marry an Indian before it became illegal. Nothing is known about the wife of Thomas Parks, but under the circumstances it seems unlikely that she was Powhatan. 

It's also unlikely that she was Monacan. The Monacan had little contact with English settlers, and lost control of their territory due to pressure from other tribes before the English had made it that far west.  The tribe still survives, and is currently headquartered in Amherst County (Virginia Places). It doesn't look like any particular tribe took control of the Monacan lands after they were displaced. Instead, it looks like there may have been a power vacuum in the area that was eventually filled by English settlers (History of Loudoun County, Wikipedia).

What about the next generation? The parents of Susannah Parks were John Parks and Mary Sharp.  We've already established that John Parks was unlikely to have any Indian ancestry. Mary Sharp's parents can't be documented; but the parents that most internet trees assign to her are English immigrant Elias Sharpe and Margaret Proctor, descendant of the well-documented Proctor family that arrived in Jamestown in 1610.  It's obvious that nobody suspects Mary Sharp of having Native ancestry, and Virginia's law against interracial marriage was in full effect when John and Mary got married in 1732. The diary of E.M. Parks records her birthdate and marriage date, but doesn't mention her ethnicity. If she was Indian, that would be an interesting fact that might have been worth mentioning. The diary does mention that her son William was killed by Indians in 1776. An account of his death on VAgenweb indicates that he was killed by the Cherokee. He was a landowner in Powell Valley, which was apparently close enough to Cherokee territory to be at risk of violence.

The Parks has a chapter on John Parks and Mary Sharp starting on page 101 of the article. It shows John Parks on a deed in Spotsylvania County in 1729; also on deeds in Orange County in 1735 and 1737, and the 1737 transaction shows that his wife's name was Mary. There is no guarantee that this is the same John Parks; but "our" John Parks was born in 1706 and married in 1732, so he was old enough to make legal deals. It shows him on several more deeds in Albemarle and Amherst counties between 1750 and 1768, and these deeds do look like the right person. He sold the last of his Amherst land in October 1768, and presumably moved to Rowan County NC after this date.  Based on the dates of the land transactions, we'd expect that Susannah Parks (birthdate 9/22/1751) was born in a part of Albemarle County that became Amherst County in 1761.

Susannah Parks married William Jarrell in Rowan County NC on 1/3/1770. The Parks family apparently lived in the part of Rowan County that became Surry County in 1771, since The Parks page 102 reports members of the Parks family paying poll taxes in Surry for most years between 1771-1775. Wilkes County was formed from Surry County and the "District of Washington" (now mostly in Tennessee) in 1777.  John Parks (Susannah's father) died in Wilkes County in 1793.  Susannah and William Jarrell lived in Wilkes County until at least 1800, and by 1804 they had moved to Floyd County KY with their children. Floyd County is their only place of residence that was ever part of Cherokee territory; but the Cherokee were already gone when the Jarrells arrived.

Note on the Crisp family: there are rumors that Abel Crisp (son-in-law of William Jarrell and Susannah Parks) also had Cherokee ancestry. This is hard to prove or disprove, since we have no documentation on his parents.  The line of descent that's usually assigned to him is:

William Crisp (1695-1783)> John Crisp (1748-1830)> Abel Crisp (1771-1809)
The accuracy of this is unknown, but if it's correct we can make some conclusions. William Crisp died in Martin County in eastern North Carolina in 1783, a long way from Cherokee territory. It's unlikely that he or his wife had any Cherokee ancestry.  His will indicates that he was rather wealthy, and also that he had a son named John. There are census reports for 1790, 1800 and 1810 showing a John Crisp in Burke County NC, but we can't tell whether he is William's son or someone else. He was the right age, and appears to have a son who was the right age to be Abel.  We don't know when John Crisp arrived in Burke County; but he was at least close to Cherokee territory, and may even have been there at a time when the Cherokee were still in the area. Given the bad state of settler/Cherokee relations in the relevant time period, it wasn't an auspicious time for cross-cultural romance; but it's not impossible.  Records for Abel Crisp are almost nonexistent, but it looks like he married Susannah Jarrell (daughter of William Jarrell and Susannah Parks) circa 1790 in North Carolina. They apparently moved to Kentucky between 1800-1804 along with the rest of the Jarrell family.

DNA testing has not found any Indigenous autosomal DNA that could reasonably be attributed to the Parks family, and a European mitochondrial haplotype on the matrilineal line.

BACK TO TOP

Other family history articles:
   The Jarrells:
     1. Jarrell family tree
     2. Jarrell landholdings
     3. Who were William Jarrell's parents?
   The Trents:
     1. Trent Y-DNA project results
     2. Trent family tree
     3. Trent landholdings
     4. Frederick Trent of Tazewell/Logan county: how many Fredericks?
     5. The Lincoln connection
     6. Original documents
   Other branches of the Jarrell/Herbert family:
     The Pocahontas problem
     The truth about Abner Vance
     The Canterbury family of Virginia
     The New Sweden line
   The Beach line:
     Richard Beach 1825-1900
     The ancestors of Donkin Dover
     Tribute to Edwin Thomas Beach
  On the paternal side:
     The Armingeon family

 

BACK TO TOP

Article by Carolyn H (a descendant of Susannah Parks)    2023 All rights reserved