The Trents of Virginia
How many
Fredericks? |
There
are many mysteries in the Trent family tree. The ancestry of the
William Trent (c.1715-1800) who married Sarah/Susannah Bryant is
unclear (see separate
article on
the results of the Trent Family DNA project).
But there are
also questions about his descendants. It is generally agreed that
William had a son named Frederick, as well as four other sons named
John, Bryant, Alexander and William (aka Williamson). There may or may not
be other sons, including James Harvey Trent whose
descendants appear to have the right Y-DNA type.
One of the questions is how many Frederick Trents
were in southwestern Virginia during the time period of roughly
1795-1835. There is a widespread belief that there are two
Fredericks, but the evidence for this is flimsy. It seems more likely that there was only one Frederick
who moved frequently between different counties instead of living in
one place, creating the impression that there was more than one of
him.
The only real evidence
for the existence of two Fredericks is the presence
of two signatures on the same petition in 1795, but it's possible that this
was an accidental or intentional double counting of the same person.
There are no records of him living in more than one place at the
same time, and there are a number of years where he can't be located
at all.
Assuming that there was just one Frederick, it's
not clear whether he had one wife who was known by two different
names, or two different wives (probably one after the other, not
both at the same
time).
Frederick's first appearance in
the record books is in 1795, but we don't know his age at that time.
He was presumably at least 21 years old (leading to the general
assumption that he was born before 1774), but he could have been
significantly older. His wife's name is usually given as Lydia, Liddy, or Leddy (all nicknames for
Elizabeth). She will be called Lydia in this article. Her
maiden name is unknown, but is sometimes listed as Hawke or Leeds
with no supporting documentation.
The alleged second Frederick
Trent also makes his first appearance in the record books in 1795, in
the same county as the first Frederick (Russell; part of the
county was renamed Tazewell at the end of 1799) . His wife was
Agnes Horton (or Harper, according to some sources). This
Frederick's descendants have the same Y-DNA type as the other
descendants of William Trent and Sarah Bryant, but no one knows who
his father was.
These alleged two Fredericks will be called Frederick/Lydia and
Frederick/Agnes in this article to help distinguish them. There are
no other Frederick Trents who are known to have been in the area at
the time.
The DNA project indicates that
these two Fredericks have the same Y-DNA haplogroup, so if there
really are two Fredericks they must be related. But where
could the second Frederick have come from? One possibility is that
Frederick/Agnes is descended from Henry Trent of Amherst (who has
the right DNA type, and might be the brother of William/Bryant), or the John
Trent who died in Albemarle County (who is believed to be the
brother of Henry of Amherst). There could be other Group 2
"founding fathers" who never made it into the record books. Some sources say (without
evidence) that Frederick/Agnes is the son of Frederick/Lydia, while
other sources say (also without evidence) that this is impossible.
The birthdates of William Trent and Sarah Bryant are unknown,
their marriage date was not
recorded, and neither was the birthdate of any of their children.
So we don't know what's possible and what isn't.
A note on Frederick's character: he seems to
have been combative. He was fined in Russell county in 1800 for
disturbing the peace by fighting with Stephen Deskins. In
1810 he was charged with disturbing the peace in Tazewell county for
fighting with John Prator at the house of Captain William Smith.
This seems to have been a brawl, since William Prator and William
Griffet were also charged with fighting at Smith's house, apparently
as part of the same incident. In Russell County in 1826, Abner
Lester bit Frederick on the right thumb "with intention to maim, disfigure and
disable the said Frederick Trent". Biting someone on the thumb
is a very strange thing to do unless that someone has their hand in
your face making it an easy target. The case went to trial in 1828
and Lester was acquitted, so maybe the jury thought Frederick had it
coming. In 1824-1826 Frederick had a long legal battle with Patrick
and James Kendrick over some sort of debt issue in Tazewell, with
the parties suing and countersuing each other, and Frederick was
found guilty of slander at one point. It seems to have ended in sort
of a standoff, with Frederick planning to contest the slander
judgment but no court records showing that he actually did it, and
Frederick agreeing to accept $29.75 from the Kendricks in a
different case instead of the $59.72 that he was entitled to.
We don't know what Frederick's job was but apparently it involved a
lot of traveling. He was prosperous enough to pay for an
attorney during his legal battle with the Kendricks. He was
apparently literate (and so was his brother Williamson), but it
appears that some of the other siblings were not.
|
BACK TO TOP
The petition versus the
tax records. In
1795, there was a petition of the inhabitants of Wythe and Russell county to
form a new county, which resulted in the creation of Tazewell county.
The Trents were living in Russell county at petition time, and the
Zajac website reports that "There were 2 Frederick Trents in Tazewell Co,
VA at this time. Both Frederick Trents were listed on the Petition, dated
25 Nov 1795; one signed as Frederick Trent and the other signed in this
order, "Jno. Trent, Frederick Trent, Wm Trent".
Frederick/Lydia were in Tazewell Co area proper. The other Frederick/Agnes,
was in the area which became Logan Co, WV and Wyoming Co."
This is problematic.
Zajac cites anecdotal evidence that Frederick and Agnes were in
Logan county in 1806, which doesn't tell us where they were in 1795. The
1806 information comes from "History of Logan County" published by Henry
Clay Ragland in 1896, which is not always accurate - see the Reference
section. Furthermore the 1806 location on Gilbert Creek was never part of
Russell or Tazewell county; in 1795 it was in Kanawha county, and the area
became part of Cabell county in 1809 and Logan county in 1824.
Click
here to see
a pdf of the petition with the Trent signatures marked. This is
clearly a list made by a clerk, not a collection of original signatures by
hundreds of different people. We don't know the details of the
signature collection process, what kind of source
documents were used to make the list, or how much potential there was for
clerical error.
County poll tax/personal property tax records (when available) are a very valuable source of
information. In Virginia, these annual lists do not include real estate tax records; they recorded the name of the head of
household and counted the number of white males over the age of 21 (or over
16 in some locations), along with recording certain property like horses.
This was the most common type of tax during the relevant time period, and
these records are usually called tax lists.
There is only one Frederick Trent on the Russell county tax list
for 1795 and several years thereafter. These records report a variable
number of Trents in the county over the years (see
Reference section). Note: tax lists weren't made in 1808 for the
whole state of Virginia.
Because there is only one Frederick in the Russell county tax records, it is possible that there was really only one Frederick who signed
the petition. Maybe he signed it twice on two different occasions, or
maybe a family member signed Frederick's name at the time of the
"Jno. Trent, Frederick Trent, Wm Trent" triple entry, without
realizing that Frederick had signed separately. John is
Frederick's brother, and it's not clear whether William is his father or his
brother.
|
BACK TO TOP
Multiple residences.
Most discussions of the family rely on sporadic records of
Frederick/Lydia in Tazewell county through 1824, and an unconfirmed report of
Frederick/Agnes in Logan county in 1806. It is assumed that each Frederick
settled down in one place because that's what most people do. So on the surface, it looks like
they couldn't be the same person because they lived in two different places.
But looks can be deceiving. The records suggest that the
Frederick Trent family moved frequently between multiple locations including
the counties of Russell, Tazewell, and Cabell/Logan in Virginia, and
possibly some locations in Kentucky. In many years, they are conspicuously absent
from the tax records in the county where they were assumed to be living. We do not find records of
a Frederick Trent living in
two different counties in the same year, although there are occasions where
he is recorded on the tax list for one county, and recorded as visiting a
different county for a specific purpose.
It is highly probable that
Frederick/Lydia and Frederick/Agnes are the same person.
There are two timelines in this section: a quick "Where's Frederick?"
timeline that lists the counties where Frederick was recorded as being physically
present; "no record" means that Frederick was not found on any type of record
anywhere. This is followed by a more complex timeline that includes information sources
for Frederick and other relevant family members. The Reference
section has additional information by county.The quick summary:
- 1795-1803 - Russell tax list. In August 1803 Frederick is in
the Tazewell Court Order book.
- 1804 - Tazewell tax list
- 1805 - no record
- 1806 - Russell tax list. Reportedly in Logan (actually still
part of Kanawha County at this time) with new cabin (may not be
accurate. He could have been there in 1805, but he's not on the
Kanawha tax list)
- 1807 - Russell tax list. In Tazewell for land sale (not on Tazewell tax list)
- 1808 - no tax lists were made in Virginia. Frederick appears
in a Tazewell court hearing.
- 1809-1811 - Tazewell tax list
- 1812-1814 - no record
- 1815 - Frederick signs a petition in Russell County
- 1816 - no record
- 1817-1818 - Russell tax list
- 1819 - no record
- 1820-1821 - Cabell (Logan) tax list. Mysterious "blank"
entry on the 1820 federal census
- 1822 - Russell tax list
- 1823 - no record
- 1824 - Tazewell, present in May for an inheritance and in November
for a court case. Not on the tax list, and not found in October when the
Sheriff first tried to summon him into court.
- 1825 - Continued activity on the Tazewell court case, but
it's not clear whether Frederick was physically present.
- 1826 - Russell tax list. Continued legal activity in
Tazewell, but it's not clear whether Frederick was physically
present.
- 1827 - Russell tax list
- 1828-1831 - no record
- 1832 - Russell tax list.
This is the last known record of Frederick. It's likely
that he died during the 1832-1835 time period.
The long version:
-
1795 -
Russell: The name Frederick Trent appears twice on a petition,
but it's possible that one person has been counted twice.
- 1795-1803 - Russell: one Frederick Trent is listed in the tax records
every year, and there are no known Fredericks listed elsewhere until August
1803. The 1803 Russell tax list does not tell the precise date the list was
made.
Tazewell: in August, Frederick wins a case in court.
- 1804 - Tazewell: Frederick is on the tax list, and Lydia is a
witness in a court case
- 1805 - Tazewell: John Trent is on the tax list but Frederick
is not.
- 1806 - Logan: Frederick and Agnes are living in a new
cabin in Logan circa 1806, according to
anecdotal information in a book that was published ninety years later and has accuracy issues.
Russell: Frederick is on the tax list.
Tazewell: John Trent is on the tax list but Frederick is not.
- 1807 - Russell: Frederick is on the tax list. Tazewell: Frederick and Lydia sell land
at the Cove.
John Trent is on the tax list but Frederick is not.
- 1808 - Tazewell Frederick appears in court for additional
proceedings related to the 1807 land sale.
- 1809 - Tazewell: Frederick is on the tax list.
- 1810 - Tazewell: Frederick is on the tax list and so is John Trent.
Cabell/Logan: John Trent is on the tax list but Frederick is not. Have
several family members been moving back and forth between Tazewell and
Cabell/Logan, possibly occupying the same cabin in Cabell/Logan?
- 1811 - Tazewell: Frederick and John Trent are on the tax
list. This is Frederick's last appearance on the Tazewell tax list.
- 1814-15 - Tazewell: Lydia is reported on the tax list
according to
Zajac, apparently
living near her brother-in-law John Trent. She is not actually on the
records for 1814, but she's there in 1815 as Liddy "Tren". Frederick's whereabouts
are unknown, except that he signed a petition dated December 6, 1815 in
Russell county. .
- 1816 - Tazewell: Lydia is on the tax list, apparently not
living too close to brother-in-law John.
Russell: Frederick doesn't appear on any tax lists, but in June
he is ordered to do a road survey with Daniel Horton, John Vance and one
other person.
- 1817-1818 - Russell: Frederick is on the tax list.
- 1820 - Tazewell: Frederick does not appear on the federal census
for the county and neither does Lydia.
Cabell: Frederick is on the tax list. His name is listed in the
federal census, probably taken from the tax list. The census didn't record any people in his household, and his
whereabouts are unknown. We can't tell whether this is the part of
Cabell that later became Logan County. Floyd County, KY: a Lydia
Trent is listed in the census with a very full household (nine children
and young adults), but Frederick
isn't there. It seems likely that this is Frederick's wife, although there are some unexplained details
in the census report. See discussion in the Reference section.
The enumeration date for the 1820 census is August 7,1820, so it looks
like the family (except for Frederick) was in Kentucky on that date.
Frederick's daughter Edy was married in Floyd County on June 9, 1820.
The marriage bond (dated July 1, 1820) says that a document with
Frederick's signature on it was submitted to the Floyd County Clerk, but
it doesn't say that Frederick was physically present.
- 1821 - Cabell/Logan: Frederick is on the tax list.
Tazewell: in April, the defendant in a debt case asks the court to
take the deposition of Frederick Trent. It is not known whether
Frederick was actually found in the county. The plaintiff in the case
was Daniel Horton, Frederick's probable brother-in-law.
- 1822 - Russell: Frederick and another white male over 16
(probably his son Humphrey) are on the tax list.
- 1823-1825 - Russell: no Trents on the tax list.
- 1824 - Tazewell: Frederick inherits property from his brother
John and signs a document related to the estate in May. In November he
makes a statement to a Tazewell justice of the peace in a legal dispute
with Patrick Kendrick. Frederick was not found when the Sheriff was
ordered to summon him in October. Logan: no Trents on the tax list.
- 1825 - Pike/Floyd, Kentucky: Humphrey Trent gets married; it
looks like
some family members may have had a repeated or ongoing presence in Kentucky.
Tazewell: continued legal activity versus the Kendrick family
(Patrick's son James Kendrick has joined the fray). The parties came to
court "by their attorneys" indicating that they may not have come in
person.
- 1826 - Russell: Frederick and another white male over 16
(probably his son Eli) are on the tax list. Frederick is bitten on the thumb by Abner Lester. Tazewell: continued legal activity versus the Kendrick family. There
are multiple cases at this point with the parties suing each other.
There were hearings in March, June and September. In March and June the
parties came by their attorneys and may not have been present
themselves. In September Patrick Kendrick (who was now deceased) came by
his attorney. It doesn't say whether Frederick also came by his
attorney, but the only recorded action on Frederick's behalf was performed by his
counsel so Frederick may not have been there in person.
- 1827 - Russell: Frederick and another white male over 16
(probably Eli) are on the tax list. Russell or Tazewell: Frederick signs a petition
for residents of either county asking for more land to
be attached to Logan county. He is not on the Tazewell tax list.
Logan:
no Trents on the tax list.
- 1828 - Russell: no Trents on the tax list. The Abner Lester
thumb-biting case from 1826 goes to trial and Lester is acquitted.
Perhpas the justices thought Frederick had it coming. People don't
usually attack someone by biting someone on the thumb unless that
someone had their hand in the person's face, making it an easy target.
The records don't say whether Frederick attended the trial.
- 1829 - Russell: no Trents on the tax list
- 1830 - Russell: the only Trent on the tax list is Alexander
(identity uncertain - see census discussion in the Reference
section). Logan: Humphrey Trent is listed on the federal
census for Logan county with a wife and three children. Barren County Kentucky:
a Lydia Trent is listed on
the federal census with six children. It seems most likely that
this is NOT Frederick's wife; it's more likely to be the widow of James
Harvey Trent. See discussion in the
Reference
section.
- 1831 - Russell: no Trents on the tax list.
- 1832 - Russell: Frederick and Eli are on the tax list.
- 1833 - Logan: Eli and Humphrey are on the tax list.
- 1833-1839 - Russell: no Trents on the tax list.
- 1835 - Logan: Agnes, Eli, and Humphrey Trent are on the tax list.
There is one male in Agnes' household (probably Frederick junior). There
is no record of Agnes after this date. This is the only known record of
Agnes that was created during her lifetime. Her only other known appearance
in a government record is in the 1893 death record for daughter Sarah
Trent Riffe saying that Sarah's parents were T and A Trent.
The 'T' might be an unfinished 'F' for Frederick (WVculture).
- 1837 - Logan: Humphrey, Eli, and Frederick Trent are on the tax list.
This is probably Frederick junior, who turned 21 in 1836.
- 1843 - Logan: Humphrey, Eli, and Frederick Trent (probably
junior) are on the tax list.
- 1830-1846 and beyond - Logan: Humphrey Trent is listed as a
landowner in the real estate tax records. His brother Eli joins the list
in 1836, and Frederick Junior in 1852. Looks like the family's wandering days were
over.
|
BACK TO TOP
Lydia and Agnes - too many wives?
Although we can't rule out the possibility that Frederick was a
bigamist who shuttled back and forth between wives in different
counties, there are other ways to reconcile this difference that
seem more likely. If Frederick really was a bigamist, then where did
Agnes live? Apparently it wasn't in Logan County. As the sons
attributed to her started appearing on tax lists, that isn't where
they were.
We know very little about Lydia and Agnes.
We don't know who their parents were, or the dates of their birth,
marriage, and death, and we don't even have a clear idea of what
their maiden names were. It's generally accepted that Agnes
had at least five children based on the Ragland book. It looks like the only documented child
attributed to Lydia is
a daughter named Linea/Linney (often transcribed as Sinea) who was born around 1801/02 (Zajac).
One possibility is that Frederick's wife was named
Elizabeth Agnes, and she switched names when she
moved to Logan county. Names could be pretty fluid in those days. It wasn't unusual to alternate between first names, middle
names, and nicknames, although it might not have been common this late in life.
Another possibility is that Lydia was Frederick's first wife, and
based on the timeline she was probably the mother of the children
that have been attributed to Agnes (see Reference
section). If Lydia and Agnes are not the same person, then Frederick and Agnes may have married
after Lydia died. They did not necessarily have any children
together, but later generations may have mistakenly thought that
Agnes was their biological grandmother. Such mistakes are not
unusual. The Ragland book published in 1896 is our only source of
information about the name of the children's mother, and it is
apparently based on anecdotes from later generations which may not
be accurate. If Frederick was really
living in Logan circa 1806, it might have been Lydia who was with
him at the time not Agnes, and her name was misreported ninety years
later.
The 1835 Logan tax list is proof that a person called Agnes Trent
really did exist, just as the earlier Tazewell records prove that
someone called Lydia Trent really existed. But it doesn't
prove that they were two different people, or that they were married
to two different Frederick Trents. The evidence indicates strongly
that there was just one Frederick. It doesn't seem too
likely that Lydia and Agnes were the same person, but it can't
be ruled out.
The
death record for Frederick's daughter Sarah Trent Riffe says
that her parents were T and A Trent, which points to a belief that
her mother's name was Agnes; the "T" may have started out
as an
F that was never completed. Sarah died of old age in 1893, roughly
60 years after Agnes' first and last appearance in a public
document. This is about the same time that the Ragland book
was published, reporting that Agnes was the mother of the five
children. By the 1890s, Frederick's descendants clearly
believed that Agnes was the mother of the children; but this might
be wrong.
Triangulated autosomal DNA matches between the descendants of Humphrey Trent
and descendants of John
Horton II,
William Horton, and members of the Kendrick family
indicate that Humphrey had Horton/Kendrick ancestry. But
this doesn't prove who his mother was; Lydia could have been a Horton, whether or not she was the same person as Agnes.
Based on the estimated birthdates of all the children (not just the
five attributed to Agnes), it's likely that
Frederick and Lydia married around 1799-1800, when Frederick was
living in Russell County. If Agnes is not the same person as Lydia
and really is the mother of the children attributed to her,
then Frederick and Agnes were presumably married by 1806 when son Humphrey was born.
This is also the year that Ragland reported them in Logan county,
saying that Frederick was from Russell County and Agnes was from
Tazewell (which was part of Russell until the end of 1799). Russell County
is obviously a good place to look for family members of Lydia
and/or Agnes.
There is no one named Hawke or Leeds on the Russell County tax lists
from 1795 (the year that Frederick first appears on the records) to
1801 (the year by which he and Lydia were presumably married). If
that was Lydia's maiden name, her male relatives can't be identified
in Russell County during the relevant time period.
But there are two Horton/Kendrick heads of household on the Russell tax
list (Familysearch)
in the relevant time period.
John Horton II is on the tax list almost every year from
1788-1806, and he had landholdings on Indian Creek, midway between
Frederick's land at the Cove and John Trent's land at Kents Ridge
(see Landholdings article).
But the 1818 deeds disposing of these lands list his heirs,
and there's no room for Frederick's wife to be one of them (Library
of Virginia). There are records indicating that Lydia ordered a
survey for
20
acres on Indian Creek, but the details are vague (Genealogy.com).
John's brother
William Horton apparently never lived in Russell County.
William's wife Mary Kendrick Horton was the sister of John Horton's
wife Isabella, and both women were sisters of Patrick Kendrick, who
unsuccessfully sued Frederick Trent in 1824. After William Horton
died in 1797, his widow and children moved to Russell County, and
Mary Horton appears on the Russell tax lists during the 1798-1811
time period in years when she had a reportable underage male in the
household. From
1812 onwards, she no longer had minor sons in her household. The
children of William and Mary Horton are not very well documented,
especially the daughters. There's room in this family for an
undocumented daughter who married Frederick Trent. John and William
Horton had other brothers who are also poorly documented, but these
brothers don't appear on the Russell tax list during the relevant
time period. It seems most likely that William and Mary Horton are
the parents of Frederick's childbearing wife.
The sons of William and Mary Horton include Daniel and Lewis
Horton, who achieved lasting notoriety when Lewis was murdered by
Abner Vance in 1817. A romantic legend has sprung up that
Vance killed Lewis in a fit of rage because Lewis dishonored Vance's
daughter. But the surviving records tell a different story.
They report that Vance was waiting at a river crossing to kill
Daniel Horton, apparently because Vance was angry about a legal
dispute. But Vance killed Lewis Horton instead because Lewis came to
the river crossing and Daniel didn't (Abner
Vance article).
The Riffe Bible entry. Frederick's daughter Sarah/Sallie (born 1810) married William Riffe. A
member story on Ancestry says that the Riffe family bible
contains this entry: "Sallie Trent Riffe was born on the Holsten River, Virginia (Chilihowie, Va.). Her mother was a Horton. She was a niece of old John Scaggs, a famous Indian fighter and guide. Sallie was a sister to old Fred Trent and a sister to Eda Cline, wife of Peter Cline who came from Holland."
Chilhowie is currently in Smyth County, Virginia, which was
formed from Washington and Wythe counties in 1832. The exact
location of Sallie's birth can't be determined, but the general area
is adjacent to Russell and Tazewell counties. We have no
record of Frederick in Washington or Wythe county, but it's certainly an area
that he could have visited. He was recorded on the Tazewell tax
lists for 1809-1811, so any stay in Washington/Wythe must have been
temporary.
The bible entry is written in the past tense, indicating that it
was made sometime after the 1893 death of Sarah/Sallie Trent Riffe.
It looks like her parents' first names had already been forgotten,
but their last names were still remembered. Two of her siblings were
still known, as well as a family connection to John Skaggs. The member story notes that the entry
made an error about Peter Cline; the Peter Cline who married Edy
Trent was probably the grandson of the Peter Cline from Holland. "Old Fred Trent"
is apparently Sarah's brother Frederick Junior.
Based on this bible entry, the member story concludes that Agnes
Horton must have been the sister of Cynthia Horton (wife of John
Skaggs). I disagree with this conclusion because it's unlikely that
Sarah was the literal niece of John Skaggs. "Uncle" is often used as a
courtesy title for an older relative, and the actual relationship might be something else.
Agnes and Cynthia could be sisters if Agnes was Frederick's younger second wife
and not the mother of his children.
But the timeline doesn't work for them to be sisters if Agnes was
the children's biological mother. The member story says "Records
also show that Cynthia Horton's father was John Horton."
I haven't found any documentation for her parents, but she is
usually claimed to be the daughter of
John Horton III and Jane Sargent. John III and
Jane Sargent are too young to be the grandparents of Humphrey Trent
(he's the oldest of the children attributed to Frederick and Agnes,
and was born in 1806). John Horton III was born circa 1777,
Jane Sargent was born circa 1782, they married around 1800, and
Cynthia Horton was born in 1804. John III and Jane are
plausible parents for Cynthia, but not for the mother of Frederick's
children.
The US census for 1850, 1860 and 1870 shows a John Skaggs with a
wife named Cynthia, but they don't show her maiden name and
neither does her
tombstone. I can't find any record that she was a Horton,
although I have no reason to doubt that this is the couple that the
bible entry was referring to. This
John Skaggs is unlikely to have been an Indian fighter and
scout. He is documented as living his entire life (1795-1876)
in Virginia, which didn't provide that sort of employment during this
time period.
|
BACK TO TOP
Supplemental
information
Russell County
property tax records, with Henry and Franklin counties as a bonus. |
These are the Trents who appear on the tax records,
all from the upper district of Russell county. It's likely that they are brothers, the sons of William Trent and Sarah Bryant,
but we can't be certain of this. The William Trent who appears on the tax
list might be the father.
- 1787 - no Trents. There is evidence that several members of the family
lived in Henry/Franklin county until about 1786.
-
1788 - John and William
-
1789 - John, Alexander and William
-
1790 - William
-
1791-1794 - John and William (1791,
1792,
1793,
1794)
-
1795 - Frederick, John and William. This is Frederick's first appearance
in the record books. This is also the year that Frederick's name appears twice on a petition.
-
1796 - Frederick, John and William
-
1797 - Frederick, John, William
and Alexander
- 1798-1799 - Frederick and John (1798,
1799)
- 1800 - record for upper Russell county is missing.
- 1801-1803 - Frederick (1801,
1802,
1803)
- 1804-1805 - no Trents
- 1806-1807 - Frederick (1806,
1807)
- 1808 - no tax taken
- 1809-1816 - no Trents
- 1817-1818 - Frederick (1817,
1818)
- 1819-1821 - no Trents
-
1822 - Frederick (2 white males over 16;
Humphrey was 16 this year)
- 1823-1825 - no Trents
- 1826-1827 - Frederick (2 white males over 16; probably Eli, who
turned 16 in 1825. Humphrey got married in Kentucky in 1825) (1826,
1827)
- 1828-1829 - no Trents
-
1830 - Alexander Trent.
It's not clear who this is.
- 1831 - no Trents
-
1832 - Frederick Trent and Eli Trent (separate households, 1 white
male in each)
- 1833-1839 - incomplete records. No Trents on the available records.
Other Russell county records:
- 1795 Petition signed twice by Frederick Trent (Library
of Virginia)
- 1797 Law Order Book 2 Frederick Trent
Plaintiff against Samuel Smith Defendant on a petition and summons. Judgment
is granted plaintiff for £2.15.7 and costs. Ordered that Frederick Trent pay
William Trent and Charity Vandike 2 dollars and 65 cents each for 5 days
attendance each as witnesses for him vs Samuel Smith (FamilySearch)
- 1799 Law Order Book 2 Ordered that John
Deskins Junior pay John Vandike and Frederick Trent 53 cents each for one
days attendance each as witnesses for him at the suit of Abednego White. (FamilySearch)
- 1799 Law Order Book 3 Stephen Deskins and Frederick
Trent [reported] for fighting by the information of George Kendricks & Smith Deskins
farmers two of our own body. And having nothing further to present were
discharged. (FamilySearch)
- 1799 Law Order Book 3 An Indenture of bargain and sale
of land from Alice Mann to Frederick Trent was produced in court yesterday
and proven by the oaths of John Vandike and Harry Smith two of the witnesses
thereto and continued for further proof.
(FamilySearch)
- 1799 Law Order Book 3 Frederick is a juror in the case of Estate of
William Roman vs Smith Deskins (FamilySearch)
- 1800 Law Order Book 3 Commonwealth vs
Stephen Deskins & Frederick Trent continued [this is a postponement of the
Sep 1799 fighting case].
(FamilySearch)
- 1800 Law Order Book 3 Commonwealth vs Frederick Trent Defendant for a breach of the
peace. This day came the attorney for the Commonwealth and thereupon came
also a Jury to wit Peter McIntosh, Toliver Wright, Simon Stacy,
Richard Davis, John Riley, James Crank, James Abbot, Joseph McFarlane,
Joseph Davis, Richard Daniel, William Cooper & Robert Tate
who being elected and sworn well and truly to assess the fine on the part of
the Commonwelath in this suit upon their oaths do assess the fined to ten
cents besides the costs. Therefore it is considered by the Court that the
attorney for the Court recover against the Defendant the fine or damages
aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed & the costs in this prosecution
expended [there is a similar case against Stephen Deskins on the same page,
with the same outcome] (FamilySearch)
- 1800 Law Order Book 3 Ordered that George
Kendrick be allowed one dollar and fifty-nine cents for three days
attendance as a witness for the Commonwealth vs Stephen Deskins & Frederick
Trent.
(FamilySearch)
- 1802 Law Order Book 3 Ordered that David Fannin, Jacob Francisco, John Brown
and Frederick Trent or any three of them being first sworn for that purposes
do view the ground proposed for a road from James Browns to the Kentucky road
and report of the conveniences and inconveniences of the said proposed road
to next court. (FamilySearch)
- 1802 Law Order Book 3 Jacob Francisco,
John Brown & Frederick Trent being appointed by a former Order to view a
road from James Browns to the Kentucky Road this day returned their report
the consideration of which is continued till the next Court. (FamilySearch)
- 1815 Petition for Russell County citizens signed by Frederick Trent
(FamilySearch).
Signatures that interest me include Daniel Horton and the top of page 1;
John Horton and Abner Vance near the bottom of the last column on page 1;
and Patrick Kendrick and Frederick Trent near the top of page 2, followed by
several more Vances.
- 1816 Frederick is ordered to do a road survey with Daniel Horton,
John Vance and one other person. The survey is to cover the area
from the state line on the Levicy Fork of Sandy to the ford of Clinch
River at Burgess Brammers, intersecting the road leading from Tazewell
to New Garden. This may provide a clue about where Frederick was
thought to be living, but I can't identify the area.
- 1827 Petition for residents of Russell and Tazewell signed by
Frederick Trent (Library
of Virginia). He probably signed in Russell County since he was
on the Russell County tax list this year.
- 1828 the outcome of the Abner Lester thumb-biting case (FamilySearch)
|
BACK TO TOP
The
Tazewell county records |
According to
Zajac, these are the records of Frederick/Lydia in Tazewell county:
- 1807 - Frederick and Lydia sell land on the Clinch River in
Tazewell
- 1824 - Frederick inherits property from his brother John in
Tazewell
Tazewell County tax lists: Tazewell county was formed in December 1799. According to
FamilySearch microfilm records of the Tazewell property tax list
[note: the first 410 images are for Tyler County; Tazewell begins at
Image 411]:
- 1801 -
no Trents.
- 1802 - April 30 John Trent only (link)
- 1803 - May 31 John Trent only (link)
- 1804 - March 15 Frederick Trent; June 8 John Trent (link)
- 1805-07 - John Trent only (1805,
1806,
1807)
- 1808 - no tax taken
- 1809-1811 - John Trent and Frederick Trent, in March/April
of each year (1809,
1810,
1811)
- 1812 - John Trent only (link)
- 1813-14 - no Trents according to the tax list, in spite of
Zajac's report that Lydia was listed in 1814 (1813,
1814)
- 1815 - Liddy "Tren" and John Trent, listed consecutively;
Zajac was right about this year. Lydia's household has one male
over the age of 16 and one horse. It's not clear who the male
could be. Frederick's
whereabouts are unknown. (link)
- 1816 - Lydia Trent on
one page and John Trent on the
next page. They may not be living close together. Lydia's household has
one male over the age of 16 and no horses. Frederick's
whereabouts are unknown.
- 1817 - John Trent only (link)
- 1818 - John Trent and William Trent. It is not clear who William
Trent is (link)
- 1819 - John Trent only (link)
- 1820 - no Trents
- 1821 - Polly Trent and John Trent. It is not clear who Polly
Trent is. (link)
- 1822 - William Trent, Polly Trent, and John Trent (link;
John is on the next page)
- 1823 - Polly Trent and John Trent (link)
- 1824 - Polly Trent only. John Trent has died. (link)
- 1825-35 - no Trents
Other Tazewell county records:
- 1803 (August) Court Order Book 1800-1810 Frederick wins a
debt case against Jas. Pemberton (FamilySearch).
- 1804 Court Order Book 1 Isaac Johnson vs James S. Lemmon
petition & summons, The debt being called came not judgment is therefore
granted to the plaintiff vs the defendants for the sum of four pounds with
Int thereon from Dec 1804 till paid and costs. Same vs Same John Trent
and Lydia Trent proved each three days attendance as witnesses for the
plaintiff. (FamilySearch).
- 1805 Court Order Book 1 Ordered that Isaac
Johnson pay Lydia Trent $3.60 cents for her attendance three courts a
witness for him against James S. Lemmon and traveling 45 miles coming and
the same returning. (FamilySearch)
- 1807 Deed Book 1 Frederick and Lydia sell their land to
Tryon Gibson (FamilySearch).
- 1808 Frederick provides additional information on the land
sale in the 1800-1810 Court Order book (FamilySearch)
- 1820 Lydia Trent orders a survey of 20 acres on Indian
Creek. See the
Trent Documents article.
- 1821 in April, the defendant in a debt case asks the court
to take Frederick's deposition. It is not known whether
Frederick actually appeared or was present in the county at all(FamilySearch)
- 1824 In May, Frederick signs a document related to the
estate of his brother John (FamilySearch)
- 1824 Patrick Kendrick vs. Frederick Trent lawsuit. Initiated
sometime between 1821 and 1824. Includes a personal appearance
by Frederick Trent before a Tazewell County justice of the peace
in November 1824. The legal battles multiplied and continued
until 1826. See the
Trent Documents article.
|
BACK TO TOP
Kanawha/Cabell/Logan county records |
There are fewer records for Frederick/Agnes than there are
for Frederick/Lydia. A major source of information is Ragland's "History
of Logan County", which states:
Passing up Gilbert Creek, we find, about the year 1806, domiciled in a
brand new cabin at the first fork above the mouth, Frederick Trent, of
Russell County, Va. He married Agnes Horton of Tazewell County. He had three
sons and two daughters. His sons were Humphrey, who married Martha Smith; Eli,
who married Mahala Elkins, and Frederick, who married a daughter of Wm
Cline. The daughters were Susan, who married Andrew Hatfield, and Sarah,
who married Wm. Riffe."
The genealogical chapters of the book can be read in
full at the
Logan WV History and Nostalgia website, which points out that the book
was published in 1896, ninety years after Frederick and Agnes were
reportedly living in their new cabin. The
West
Virginia Encyclopedia says that Ragland was not a native of Logan
county, and didn't move there until 1874. The book is obviously not a
first-hand account and records are very scanty, so he must have collected
his genealogical information by talking to later generations of Logan
residents who didn't necessarily have all their facts straight. The book contains a number of factual errors about other people
in my family tree. In the paragraph above, Ragland correctly states that
Frederick's daughter Susan married Andrew Hatfield, but in a later chapter
he contradicts himself and says that Andrew married a daughter of Humphrey Trent. The bride was Humphrey's sister, not his daughter.
In summary, the information in this book is not always accurate and should
not be taken as gospel. Notice that according to the link, it says
ABOUT the year 1806, not IN the year of 1806 as stated on the
Zajac website. This is an important distinction.
Notice that the book says Frederick was from Russell
county, which shows only one Frederick Trent on the tax list from 1795-1803.
It says that Agnes was from Tazewell - a place where Lydia appears in the
record books several times but Agnes can't be found.
 |
The 1820
Frederick census. Click for a larger view |
Cabell county was created from Kanawha county in 1809. Logan county was created in 1824 from parts of Giles, Tazewell, Cabell, and
Kanawha counties (Wikipedia).
Part of it became Mingo county in 1895. This varied past, plus the general
shortage of documents, makes it difficult to find records. But Frederick
does appear on the 1820 census for Cabell county (later Logan), and this is
his only known appearance on a federal census. But the only thing in
this listing is his name. No people were counted in his household. The
names on the census are more or less in alphabetical order, suggesting that
somebody made a list of the expected households (probably copied from
property tax records; Frederick was on the Cabell tax list in 1820) and then went out to collect data from them. But
it looks like nobody was living at Frederick's place.Microfilm
records at
FamilySearch show the following on the Cabell county tax lists:
- 1809 - no Trents
- 1810-11 - John Trent only (1810,
1811)
- 1812-19 - no Trents
- 1820-21 - Frederick Trent, with two horses in 1820 and three in 1821.
Horsepower is useful for a traveling man (1820,
1821)
- 1822-41 - no Trents. From 1824 onwards, this list shows the portion of Cabell
that did NOT become part of Logan county. Before 1824, we can't be sure
which part of Cabell it is.
The
Cabell County deed records show no Trents in the relevant time period.
The
Kanawha County tax lists show no Trents from 1806-1809. Cabell was
created out of Kanawha in 1809. The records for 1803-1805 are missing, which
is unfortunate since Frederick may have been in Kanawha in 1805.
WVGenWeb (now on Archive.org; the original website seems to be offline) has transcribed lists for a few years of Logan County personal tax
lists; these are the records that survived the Civil War, and the other
years perished. The originals are not available online. Here's the number of Trents that are reported in the available years:
- 1824 - zero
- 1827 - zero
- 1833 - two, sort of (Eli and Humphrey, both sons of Frederick.
Humphrey has a line through part of the name and figures)
- 1835 - three (Agnes, Eli, and Humphrey)
- 1837 - three (Humphrey, Eli, and Frederick. This is probably Frederick
junior, another son)
- 1843 - three (Humphrey, Eli, and Frederick)
Microfilms of the Logan County land books for 1824-1902 are available
online at
FamilySearch. This is a real estate tax list that shows the property
owners. There is no index
or search function; manual scrolling is required. They show the following
through 1846: -
1824-1829: no Trents
- 1830-35: Humphrey Trent: 37 acres on Sandy River (1830,
1831,
1832,
1833,
1834,
1835).
- 1836: Humphrey Trent: 37 acres on Sandy River, 50 acres on
Alum Creek, 15 acres on Bens Creek; Ali [Eli] Trent: 40
acres on Bens Creek (1836)
- 1837-38: Humphrey Trent: 50 acres on Alum Creek, 15 acres on Bens
Creek; Eli Trent: 40 acres on Bens Creek (1837,
1838)
- 1839-46: Humphrey Trent: 12 acres on Alum Creek, 15 acres on Bens
Creek; Eli Trent: 40 acres on Bens Creek (1839,
1840,
1841,
1842,
1843,
1844,
1845,
1846)
|
BACK TO TOP
The
Lydia Trent census records |
We need a good understanding of Frederick's
children in order to interpret the census records, as well as
keeping an open mind about who their mother really was. The children
that the Ragland book attributes to Agnes are sons Humphrey born
1806, Eli born 1809, and Frederick junior born 1815 (according to
their ages as reported on a later federal census). Ragland also
reported two daughters, Susan and Sarah. Sarah's death record
indicates a birthdate of 1810 (WVculture).
Susan's birthdate isn't as clear, but 1811 is the date usually given. Frederick and Agnes are sometimes given credit
for more children, particularly a daughter named Edy who was born
around 1803. Edy's 1820 marriage bond in Floyd County KY says
clearly that Frederick is her father but doesn't mention her mother.
The 1820 census indicates that Lydia and all the kids were in
Floyd County five weeks after the wedding, which strongly suggests
that Lydia is Edy's mother. DNA evidence indicates that Edy
has Horton/Kendrick ancestry, and so do the children attributed to
Agnes. Zajac
reports a daughter named Sinea/Linney (real name looks like Linea) who was born in 1801/02.
A daughter Chloe born around 1800 has also been reported without
supporting evidence. The 1820 federal census helps support the
notion that Lydia was the mother of all these
children, and possibly more whose names have not been linked
to Frederick. Side note: Although the
Ragland book says that Frederick was the father of the five
children, it does not say that Agnes was their mother! But this is
just the book's style, which typically gave all the credit for
children to the father alone. So we can't read anything into this.
The 1820 Census.
 |
The 1820
Lydia census. Click for a larger view |
At the time the 1820 census was taken, Floyd County, Kentucky was
bigger than it was today, and included the area that became Pike
county in 1821. The Pike portion of Floyd county shared a boundary with the area that
became Logan county (and later Mingo county), so the residents of
Floyd could live very close to Logan county even though they were
technically in different states.
On the 1820 census, there is a woman named Lydia Trent living in
Floyd county with nine children and young adults. She is listed as the head of
household, and there is no male in the house old enough to be her
husband. There are no other Trents on the page,
but Valentine Hatfield is there and so is his brother Joseph. Their presence
provides indirect evidence that this is Frederick's wife, as explained in the section on the
Hatfield connection.
The census shows a total of ten people in the household:
- 1 female over 45 - this must be Lydia.
We don't know where Frederick was.
- 1 male 18-26 - Who is this? He would have been born between
1794-1802. There is also an unidentified male age 16-21 in Lydia's household
on the 1815-1816 Tazewell county tax lists, who would have been born around
1794-1799. If there is a missing son, then the William Trent who appeared on
the Tazewell tax list in 1818 and 1822 might be a candidate. So is the
Alexander Trent who briefly appeared in Russell county in 1830. It's
possible that some other young-adult male might have stayed with Lydia to
help the family when Frederick was away. Or it might be Lydia's son-in-law.
Two of the presumed daughters got married shortly before the census was
taken on August 7.
- 3 females 16-26 - Chloe was 20, Linea was 18 or 19, and Edy was
17. Edy got married in Floyd county in July 1820 and Chloe got married in
Tazewell in May 1820. Linea
reportedly got married in Tazewell in 1822 (Zajac).
The timeline shows that Frederick and a Trent male over the age of 16 were
in Russell county in 1822, so the family was apparently back in Virginia by the time
Chloe got married.
- 1 male 10-16 - Humphrey was 14.
- 2 males under 10 - Eli was 11 and should have been in the same
category as Humphrey. But age mistakes are common on the census, so he
might have been counted here. Frederick Junior was 5.
- 2 females under 10 - Susan and Sarah were about 10 years old.
Overall, this is a good fit with the known children of
Frederick Trent. If this is the correct family, and if Lydia and
Agnes are two different people, then we can conclude that the
mother of the children was Lydia, not Agnes. Assuming that
Frederick did not have large families in two different places,
of course.
The 1830 Census.
 |
The 1830
Lydia census. Click for a larger view |
The 1830 census shows a Lydia Trent living in Barren County,
Kentucky. It's not clear who this is. Barren county is in the middle of the state, about
200 miles away from the other places where we find Frederick's family.
But it is also the county where Frederick's mother is believed to
have died c.1815, and there were other Trents still in the area.
Several of them are listed on the same page as Lydia, including an
Alexander Trent who is 60-70 years old. He may be Frederick's
brother, and seems unlikely to be the same Alexander Trent on the
1830 Russell tax list. There is also a Frederick Trent, who at
20-30 years old is much too young to be "our" Frederick, but may be
named after him. It's possible that "our" Lydia and her
children were paying a visit. But it's more likely that this is
Lydia the widow of James Harvey Trent. The ages of the
children on the census are a good fit with her five youngest
children. Her son James Junior married his cousin Margaret Trent in
Barren County in 1826, so at least some of the James Harvey Trent
family had a presence in Barren County around this time period.
The census shows a total of six people in the household, and it's
not a particularly good match for Frederick's family:
- 1 female 40-49 - Frederick's wife Lydia was over 45 in the
1820 census and should be in the 50-59 group on this
census.
- 1 male 15-19 - Eli is 21.
- 1 male 10-14 - Frederick junior is 15.
- 1 female 10-14 - This doesn't fit any of the known children. Susan and Sarah would be
about 20, and there were no daughters in this age range in 1820. It's
possible that there could be a daughter born just after the 1820 census who
is now ten.
- 2 females 5-9 - these girls were obviously born after the 1820
census.
James Harvey Trent and Lydia Young(?) married around 1795.
She seems more likely to be over 50 in 1830, but 49 is not
impossible. On the 1830 census, the male 15-19 could be
their son John (born 1812); the male 10-14 could be Jackson
(born 1818); the female 10-14 could be Nancy (born 1815); and
the 2 females 5-9 could be Charity (born 1819) and Lynie (born
1823).
|
BACK TO TOP
The Trents
of Logan county had marriage ties to the Hatfields (whose famous
feud with the McCoys was still several decades in the future at this
point). An understanding of this connection will help explain why
the presence of two Hatfields on the 1820 census for Floyd County,
Kentucky provides evidence that the Lydia Trent on the same page was
Frederick Trent's wife.
In 1825, Frederick's son Humphrey Trent married Martha Smith in Pike/Floyd county. Martha
was the daughter of Thomas
Smith, and Thomas was a half-brother of Valentine Hatfield (they had
the same mother). The question is, how did Humphrey and Martha meet?
Thomas Smith was in Logan county in 1824 according to the
Logan county tax lists, and the Ragland book says that he
settled in Logan "some time before Frederick Trent" allegedly
arrived in 1806. The Trents may have had a sporadic presence in
Logan county, but they didn't start appearing as continuous
residents until Humphrey became a landowner there in 1830. The timeline
suggests
that they traveled around a lot in the interim.
In addition, Frederick's daughter Susan had married Valentine
Hatfield's son Andrew by 1833; their first child was reportedly born
in February 1834. Several Hatfields made
their first appearance on the Logan tax list in 1833, including
Ephraim Hatfield (Valentine's father and Thomas Smith's stepfather).
But Valentine Hatfield is first seen on the tax list for 1835, and
Andrew doesn't appear until 1837. The
Logan County deed records show that the family started buying
land there in 1838. How
did Susan and Andrew meet?
The presence of both Valentine Hatfield and Lydia Trent on the
same page of the 1820 Floyd census suggests that they didn't live
too far apart, so these families
could have known each other for a long time before they
started appearing on the Logan tax list in the 1830s. We
naturally expect Andrew Hatfield to be living in his father's
household at least until he comes of age; there were a lot of
children in Lydia's household on the 1820 census, apparently including
Humphrey and Susan; and there may have been visits between the
Smiths and the Hatfields in Floyd and/or Logan, with possible opportunities
for the Trents to meet them as they traveled through the area.
Thomas Smith is on the 1824 Logan tax list, then is absent from the list
in 1827, and reappears in 1833; we don't know where he and his
family were in the interim, and the records are sporadic so we don't
know how long they were away. Humphrey Trent and Martha Smith got
married on June 15, 1825 in Pike/Floyd county (there's a record
proving it), so we know that they went to that county at
least once. Marriage records for Susan Trent and
Andrew Hatfield have not been located, so we don't know exactly when or where they got married.
The Hatfields were still in Kentucky on the 1830 census, in the
part of Floyd county that had been renamed Pike county in 1821. There are no Trents on the
same census page. Valentine Hatfield is on the
Pike County tax list from 1823 to 1834. Andrew Hatfield is
on the Pike tax list for 1831 (when he turned 21) and 1833 (there is
no list for 1832), then disappears from Pike County. He appears in
Logan county in 1837.
The relationship between the Hatfields and the
Trents apparently continued after they all moved to Logan county in
the 1830s. The 1840
census shows Valentine Hatfield, Thomas Smith, and Humphrey Trent
consecutively - one right after another - so it looks like they were
near neighbors. Land records suggest that this was near the
Browning Fork of Horsepen Creek. Humphrey Trent and
Valentine Hatfield are listed on the same page of the 1850 census,
along with two other Hatfield households and two Smith households
(but not Thomas Smith, who may have died by this time). In 1860, Humphrey is listed on the same page as three Hatfield households, but Valentine isn't one of them
even though he was still alive. That was
Humphrey's last census - he died in 1866, reportedly after
being bitten by a rabid squirrel.
|
BACK TO TOP
Kentucky records. There are signs of a sporadic family presence in
the part of Floyd County, Kentucky that became Pike County in 1821.
But we haven't found any record of Frederick himself in Kentucky.
The Kentucky property tax list included both land and personal
property, and simply owning a horse was enough to put an adult male
on the tax list (Kentucky
Secretary of State). The available
Pike County tax lists for 1823-1836 do not show any Trents. The
Floyd County tax lists for the relevant years are missing.
The Annals of Floyd County, Kentucky, page 254 has the July 1,
1820 marriage bond for the marriage of Edy Trent. It says: "My
son Peter Cline wishes to obtain licence to marry Edy Trent, a
daughter of Frederick Trent who has hereto requested and signed his
name for you to issue the same. We both have mutually agreed for
them to marry and do hereby request you to issue the license. 16,
June 1820".
FamilySearch has a statement from the deputy clerk saying "I...
do hereby certify that Peter Cline produced the necessary
certificate from his father and Frederick Trent the father of the
said Edy Trent authorising me to issue them license". It sounds like Frederick wrote out his permission
and gave it to Cline to submit to the clerk, but Frederick may not
have been
physically present when the document was submitted.
Virginia county name changes.
MAPofUS has an excellent interactive map of Virginia that lets
you click through the years to see how the county lines changed.
You can also watch a time-lapse animation, but it moves too fast to
be useful. Other state maps are also available.
|
BACK TO TOP
BACK TO TOP
Article by Carolyn H (a descendant of
Frederick Trent through his son Humphrey), with assistance from Sharon
Carter (a descendant of Field Trent of Patrick County, Virginia). 2020-2025 All rights reserved
|
| |